On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:48:28PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > you forgot to comment on the fact that gpio_desc shouldn't be held in an > array. Any comments ? I did not comment on that because that's someone elses problem. > What I mean is that, just like irq_descs, we should be able to allocate > them dynamically. Maybe, just like irq_descs, hold them in a radix tree > and maybe even have a matching API "gpio_alloc_descs()". Probably - I expect Grant would really like to see some patches along those lines. As I say, someone elses problem. But what is _our_ problem is what to do with all the ARCH_NR_GPIOs that we have now, and stop them increasing. There is a trivial solution to that which I outlined which can be used until GPIO gets something along your idea - and which doesn't involve me having to argue with those who think that the kernel should remain as small as possible. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
