On Monday 31 January 2011 04:48 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:42:39PM +0530, Varun Wadekar wrote: >> On Tuesday 25 January 2011 08:13 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >>> This looks to be the same IRQ as is used for alarms above - how do these >>> two bits of code play together? The IRQ hander... >>> ...only appears to handle alarm interrupts. >> That's right. Since only a single alarm is being used, rtc->irq is >> treated as the controlling element. > That's a problem, it means that changing the update IRQ status will > disable alarms too which really isn't what we want. The right way to fix this would be to add support for all the alarms provided by tps. Will add that support and post it in my next patch. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
