On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:42:39PM +0530, Varun Wadekar wrote: > On Tuesday 25 January 2011 08:13 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > This looks to be the same IRQ as is used for alarms above - how do these > > two bits of code play together? The IRQ hander... > > ...only appears to handle alarm interrupts. > That's right. Since only a single alarm is being used, rtc->irq is > treated as the controlling element. That's a problem, it means that changing the update IRQ status will disable alarms too which really isn't what we want. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
