On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:14:45AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 08:38:28AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > > > Finally, I though linux-tegra-2.6.36 wasn't itself destined for upstream > > > directly; instead, isn't the for-next or tegra/for-next the branch > > > destined for upstream? > > > > Like I say, if this isn't for a branch destined for mainline it's not a > > problem. > > Eric, Colin, > > (or anyone else more experienced in linux-tegra-2.6.36 operation) > > Can you comment on whether linux-tegra-2.6.36 is intended to go directly > upstream, or whether only the various for-next branches are intended to > go upstream. Only for-next is for upstream. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
