> Hmm, then how can they live with NetApp? I'm sure there are a number of NetApp customers that ask themselves that question regularly. It would be possible to re-implement the SCSI fencing script to use preempt rather than preempt-abort, but I suspect the motivation for prempt-abort is to prevent any outstanding i/o operations from completing (because absent this, a successful preempt operation isn't really equivalent to a fencing operation). I'm not sure what the real risks are in this situation. Does anyone have any thoughts? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
