Re: Quick Failover & Scalability questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I personally do not think that is required for the iscsi protocol since
> *) there is so little state required in iscsi
> *) all initiators quickly reconnect and quickly rebuild all required
> state in almost all situations anyway.

What happens to persistent reservations in this sort of situation?  My
naive assumption is that these would be lost, absent some mechanism
for synchronizing this information among multiple tgtd instances.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux