Re: [PATCH 0/4] tgt: Address issues with reservation preempt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 09:25:35 -0400
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > If someone sends a patch for that feature, I'm happy to apply it. As I
> > wrote before, I assume that nobdoy actually uses it because netapp
> > doesn't support it.
> 
> And as I wrote before, people are actually using that feature (or
> trying to, anyway) on Real Live Systems.  The preempt-abort feature is
> used by the SCSI fencing available with RedHat's cluster storage tools
> (which, when it works, is one of the easiest fencing methods to
> configure).

Hmm, then how can they live with NetApp?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux