On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:01:34 +0200 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:08:55 +0200 > > Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Boaz Harrosh wrote: > >>> FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > >>>> I prefer include/bsd/ > >>> Sure, what ever is best for you > >>> Boaz > >>> > >> I just realized, Are you sure you want include/bsd/. This means that include/ is an empty (new) > >> directory with only one subdir in it? > > > > Yeah, it doesn't look good. > > > > How about just creating a new dir, bsd, and then puting everything in > > it? We will have > > > > usr/bsd/byteswap.h > > usr/bsd/endian.h > > usr/bsd/linux/fs.h > > usr/bsd/epoll.c > > ... > > > > We don't have a directory 'include' for header files now so it's wired > > to create 'include' dir for portability stuff. > > This could work, only that I also use all these headers from out-side, from > all of the osd projects (target initiator util) maybe just tgt/bsd strait. > > But I have no strong feelings what ever is best for you I will use. > tgt/bsd or tgt/usr/bsd or tgt/include/bsd it's really the same, what > ever you decide I'll go head and put them in tgt/usr/bsd. Ok. And then I cancel libos/linux.c and libos/bsg.c stuff: http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/stgt/2009-February/002712.html Let's create something like usr/linux/net.c and usr/bsd/net.c -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
