On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:08:55 +0200 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > >> I prefer include/bsd/ > > > > Sure, what ever is best for you > > Boaz > > > > I just realized, Are you sure you want include/bsd/. This means that include/ is an empty (new) > directory with only one subdir in it? Yeah, it doesn't look good. How about just creating a new dir, bsd, and then puting everything in it? We will have usr/bsd/byteswap.h usr/bsd/endian.h usr/bsd/linux/fs.h usr/bsd/epoll.c ... We don't have a directory 'include' for header files now so it's wired to create 'include' dir for portability stuff. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
