FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:08:55 +0200 > Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Boaz Harrosh wrote: >>> FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >>>> I prefer include/bsd/ >>> Sure, what ever is best for you >>> Boaz >>> >> I just realized, Are you sure you want include/bsd/. This means that include/ is an empty (new) >> directory with only one subdir in it? > > Yeah, it doesn't look good. > > How about just creating a new dir, bsd, and then puting everything in > it? We will have > > usr/bsd/byteswap.h > usr/bsd/endian.h > usr/bsd/linux/fs.h > usr/bsd/epoll.c > ... > > We don't have a directory 'include' for header files now so it's wired > to create 'include' dir for portability stuff. This could work, only that I also use all these headers from out-side, from all of the osd projects (target initiator util) maybe just tgt/bsd strait. But I have no strong feelings what ever is best for you I will use. tgt/bsd or tgt/usr/bsd or tgt/include/bsd it's really the same, what ever you decide I'll go head and put them in tgt/usr/bsd. Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
