Re: [PATCH 13/14] tgt: bsd_include/ headers, emulates some Linuxism in BSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:08:55 +0200
> Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>>>> I prefer include/bsd/
>>> Sure, what ever is best for you
>>> Boaz
>>>
>> I just realized, Are you sure you want include/bsd/. This means that include/ is an empty (new)
>> directory with only one subdir in it?
> 
> Yeah, it doesn't look good.
> 
> How about just creating a new dir, bsd, and then puting everything in
> it? We will have
> 
> usr/bsd/byteswap.h
> usr/bsd/endian.h
> usr/bsd/linux/fs.h
> usr/bsd/epoll.c
> ...
> 
> We don't have a directory 'include' for header files now so it's wired
> to create 'include' dir for portability stuff.

This could work, only that I also use all these headers from out-side, from
all of the osd projects (target initiator util) maybe just tgt/bsd strait.

But I have no strong feelings what ever is best for you I will use.
tgt/bsd or tgt/usr/bsd or tgt/include/bsd it's really the same, what
ever you decide I'll go head and put them in tgt/usr/bsd.

Thanks
Boaz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux