On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 11:54:40PM +0200, Philipp Hortmann wrote:
> On 7/13/23 01:35, Tree Davies wrote:
> > Rename variable pBA to pba in order to Fix checkpatch
> > warning: Avoid CamelCase
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tree Davies<tdavies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 106 +++++++++++-----------
> > drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
>
> Hi Tree,
> the p is typically for pointer. This is not wanted when you change the name.
> But ba is is in use....
>
> Bye Philipp
Thanks Philipp,
A few thoughts...
Looking at occurances of pBA, they all appear as local variable
declarations of struct ba_record, mostly as function params.
I also see what you mentioned, as BA being already taken in
rtl819x_BAProc.c:394 and line 292, but I don't 'think' that renaming them
both to ba will result negatively(?).
Agreed, let's wait on Greg.
Cheers!
Tree
