On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 5:40 AM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 14:04 +0000, Tanjuate Brunostar wrote: > > Replace the use of udelay by usleep_range as suggested by checkpatch: > > > > CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst > > + udelay(30); > [] > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c > [] > > @@ -3235,7 +3235,7 @@ static int ms_write_multiple_pages(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u16 old_blk, > > return STATUS_FAIL; > > } > > > > - udelay(30); > > + usleep_range(30, 30); > > >This isn't useful. Please read the Documentation/timers. Yes I read the documentation and realized the changes were not necessary
