Replace the use of udelay by usleep_range as suggested by checkpatch: CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst + udelay(30); CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst + udelay(50); Signed-off-by: Tanjuate Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@xxxxxxxxx> --- v2: changed the max values of the usleep_rage instances as they cannot be equal to the min values as suggested by checkpatch drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c index 14449f8afad5..a9724ca5eccf 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c @@ -3235,7 +3235,7 @@ static int ms_write_multiple_pages(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u16 old_blk, return STATUS_FAIL; } - udelay(30); + usleep_range(30, 31); rtsx_init_cmd(chip); @@ -4157,7 +4157,7 @@ int mg_set_ICV(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct rtsx_chip *chip) #ifdef MG_SET_ICV_SLOW for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { - udelay(50); + usleep_range(50, 51); rtsx_init_cmd(chip); -- 2.34.1