On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 04:04:48PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On 1/25/22 15:59, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 03:48:32PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote: > > > Hi Phillip, > > > > > > On 1/25/22 01:44, Phillip Potter wrote: > > > > Remove all DBG_88E calls from the os_dep directory, other than those in > > > > os_dep/ioctl_linux.c, as this contains almost 200 on its own so will be > > > > done in a separate patch for ease of review. These calls do not conform > > > > to kernel coding standards and are superfluous. Also restructure where > > > > appropriate to remove no longer needed code left behind by removal of > > > > these calls. This will allow the eventual removal of the DBG_88E macro > > > > itself. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > > > [code snip] > > > > > > > - /* 2012-07-11 Move here to prevent the 8723AS-VAU BT auto > > > > - * suspend influence */ > > > > - if (usb_autopm_get_interface(pusb_intf) < 0) > > > > - DBG_88E("can't get autopm:\n"); > > > > - > > > > > > Didn't you make a function change here? I didn't test and also didn't find > > > any mentions of tests in cover letter. > > > > It is obviously a bug. Please avoid ask rhetorical questions or someone > > will answer them. > > > > It isn't so obvious for me. Might be Phillip knows something about > 8723AS-VAU BT (whatever it is) issue. > > I prefer not to say "it's an error", when I am not 100% sure :) Oh, in that case, well done. Good job on the review. :) regards, dan carpenter