On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 02:50:44PM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thus wrote Dan Carpenter (dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx):
>
> > On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 07:55:06PM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
>
> > > - if (_SUCCESS == ret)
> > > - goto exit;
> > > - }
> > > + if (_SUCCESS == ret)
> > > + return;
> > > }
> > > - Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E(Adapter, _offset, _size_byte, pbuf, bPseudoTest);
>
> > It looks like this changes how the code works here. Originally we
> > called Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E() fir rtw_IOL_applied() was false or if
> > iol_read_efuse() failed.
>
> the call to Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E is still there, it's below the part
> that you quoted:
>
> - Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E(Adapter, _offset, _size_byte, pbuf, bPseudoTest);
> -
> -exit:
> - return;
> -}
>
> -static void ReadEFuse_Pseudo(struct adapter *Adapter, u16 _offset, u16 _size_byte, u8 *pbuf, bool bPseudoTest)
> -{
> - Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E(Adapter, _offset, _size_byte, pbuf, bPseudoTest);
> + Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E(Adapter, _offset, _size_byte, pbuf);
> }
>
> The removal of ReadEFuse_Pseudo makes the diff a bit confusing. When I
> checked the patches before posting, I stumbled across this part as well.
Oh... Sorry. I should have seen that. Thanks!
regards,
dan carpenter
