Hi Dan,
Thus wrote Dan Carpenter (dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx):
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 07:55:06PM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> > - if (_SUCCESS == ret)
> > - goto exit;
> > - }
> > + if (_SUCCESS == ret)
> > + return;
> > }
> > - Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E(Adapter, _offset, _size_byte, pbuf, bPseudoTest);
> It looks like this changes how the code works here. Originally we
> called Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E() fir rtw_IOL_applied() was false or if
> iol_read_efuse() failed.
the call to Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E is still there, it's below the part
that you quoted:
- Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E(Adapter, _offset, _size_byte, pbuf, bPseudoTest);
-
-exit:
- return;
-}
-static void ReadEFuse_Pseudo(struct adapter *Adapter, u16 _offset, u16 _size_byte, u8 *pbuf, bool bPseudoTest)
-{
- Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E(Adapter, _offset, _size_byte, pbuf, bPseudoTest);
+ Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E(Adapter, _offset, _size_byte, pbuf);
}
The removal of ReadEFuse_Pseudo makes the diff a bit confusing. When I
checked the patches before posting, I stumbled across this part as well.
Best regards,
Martin
