On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:55:42PM -0300, ascordeiro wrote:
> Em qua, 2021-04-14 às 21:33 +0300, Sakari Ailus escreveu:
> > Hi Aline,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:27:55PM -0300, Aline Santana Cordeiro
> > wrote:
> > > Format multi-line comments according to the coding-style.
> > > Issue detected by checkpatch.pl.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Aline Santana Cordeiro <
> > > alinesantanacordeiro@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c | 109
> > > ++++++++++++++----------
> > > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c
> > > b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c
> > > index 592ea99..6113785 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c
> > > @@ -67,7 +67,8 @@
> > > * At 15fps this means 133ms. We set the timeout a bit longer.
> > > * Each flash driver is supposed to set its own timeout, but
> > > * just in case someone else changed the timeout, we set it
> > > - * here to make sure we don't damage the flash hardware. */
> > > + * here to make sure we don't damage the flash hardware.
> > > + */
> > > #define FLASH_TIMEOUT 800 /* ms */
> > >
> > > union host {
> > > @@ -562,7 +563,8 @@ irqreturn_t atomisp_isr(int irq, void *dev)
> > > * and driver needs to keep old
> > > sequence_temp value.
> > > * NOTE: There is assumption here that ISP
> > > will not
> > > * start processing next frame from sensor
> > > before old
> > > - * one is completely done. */
> > > + * one is completely done.
> > > + */
> > > if (atomic_read(&asd->sequence) ==
> > > atomic_read(
> > > &asd->sequence_temp))
> > > atomic_set(&asd->sequence_temp,
> > > @@ -1247,7 +1249,8 @@ void atomisp_buf_done(struct
> > > atomisp_sub_device *asd, int error,
> > >
> > > if (IS_ISP2401) {
> > > /* If there are no buffers queued then
> >
> > This should begin with:
> >
> > /*
> > *
> >
> > And the same for the rest. Apart from this the patch seems fine.
> >
> Hi Sakari,
>
> I'm going to send a v2 correcting all the multi-line comments that are
> not beginning like this.
>
> Besides, there are single line comments with different styles, a few
> like this:
>
> case 1: /* comment */
>
> and the other like this:
> /*
> case2: * comment
> */
>
> Should I standardize these ones to the first case?
The first one is preferred for multi-line comments. But please keep under
80 characters per line.
>
> Thank you for yout attention,
You're welcome!
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
