Em qua, 2021-04-14 às 21:33 +0300, Sakari Ailus escreveu:
> Hi Aline,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:27:55PM -0300, Aline Santana Cordeiro
> wrote:
> > Format multi-line comments according to the coding-style.
> > Issue detected by checkpatch.pl.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aline Santana Cordeiro <
> > alinesantanacordeiro@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c | 109
> > ++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c
> > b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c
> > index 592ea99..6113785 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c
> > @@ -67,7 +67,8 @@
> > * At 15fps this means 133ms. We set the timeout a bit longer.
> > * Each flash driver is supposed to set its own timeout, but
> > * just in case someone else changed the timeout, we set it
> > - * here to make sure we don't damage the flash hardware. */
> > + * here to make sure we don't damage the flash hardware.
> > + */
> > #define FLASH_TIMEOUT 800 /* ms */
> >
> > union host {
> > @@ -562,7 +563,8 @@ irqreturn_t atomisp_isr(int irq, void *dev)
> > * and driver needs to keep old
> > sequence_temp value.
> > * NOTE: There is assumption here that ISP
> > will not
> > * start processing next frame from sensor
> > before old
> > - * one is completely done. */
> > + * one is completely done.
> > + */
> > if (atomic_read(&asd->sequence) ==
> > atomic_read(
> > &asd->sequence_temp))
> > atomic_set(&asd->sequence_temp,
> > @@ -1247,7 +1249,8 @@ void atomisp_buf_done(struct
> > atomisp_sub_device *asd, int error,
> >
> > if (IS_ISP2401) {
> > /* If there are no buffers queued then
>
> This should begin with:
>
> /*
> *
>
> And the same for the rest. Apart from this the patch seems fine.
>
Hi Sakari,
I'm going to send a v2 correcting all the multi-line comments that are
not beginning like this.
Besides, there are single line comments with different styles, a few
like this:
case 1: /* comment */
and the other like this:
/*
case2: * comment
*/
Should I standardize these ones to the first case?
Thank you for yout attention,
Aline
