Hi, On 25-Nov-24 1:34 PM, Alexis Lothoré wrote: > Hi Hans, thanks a lot for the the help ! > > On Mon Nov 25, 2024 at 11:05 AM CET, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi Alexis, >> >> On 24-Nov-24 8:23 PM, Alexis Lothoré wrote: >>> Hello, > [...] > >>> I systematically observe this issue (probe failure with -22) on each boot, >>> and reached the same intermediate conclusion (IRQ failing to register, and >>> spi->irq value being -EPROBE_DEFER). >>> I can confirm that this patch makes the vsc-tp -22 error disappear on my >>> machine, and that I have now /sys/devices/platform/intel_vsc. >>> >>> Unfortunately, I now encounter a new issue preventing the camera to work >>> (ipu6 still fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, I now have >>> ipu_bridge_get_ivsc_csi_dev failing while searching for child device >>> intel_vsc-92335fcf-3203-4472-af93-7b4453ac29da). >> >> This sounds like you may not have the actual MEI driver enabled or >> that it is not binding. > > You were right, it looks like I have been missing CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_VSC. My > config is comming from the archlinux kernel, there may be a miss here. > >> Do you have both CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_VSC_HW and CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_VSC enabled? > > So now with this change, I still have no success with ipu loading, because > of new errors on vsc-tp, but those errors have actually changed: > > $ dmesg|grep vsc > [ 8.594501] vsc-tp spi-INTC1094:00: wait rom failed ret: -110 > [ 8.594506] intel_vsc intel_vsc: hw_reset failed ret = -110 > [ 9.138269] vsc-tp spi-INTC1094:00: wait rom failed ret: -110 > [ 9.138287] intel_vsc intel_vsc: hw_reset failed ret = -110 > [ 9.678712] vsc-tp spi-INTC1094:00: wait rom failed ret: -110 > [ 9.678729] intel_vsc intel_vsc: hw_reset failed ret = -110 > [ 9.678750] intel_vsc intel_vsc: reset: reached maximal consecutive resets: disabling the device > [ 9.678755] intel_vsc intel_vsc: reset failed ret = -19 > [ 9.678758] intel_vsc intel_vsc: link layer initialization failed. > [ 9.678761] intel_vsc intel_vsc: error -ENODEV: init hw failed > > I have seen some mentions of this -110 error in the many redhat bugzilla > issues you have been helping with, I'll check more thoroughly if some hints > and/or patches have emerged from there. Right. So this is a problem where the VSC chip is unresponsive which we still do not fully understand. power-cycling the laptop; or sometimes a power-cycle + if things still don't work a reboot after the power-cycle clears this. > For the record, I am doing my tests with the current Archlinux kernel > (6.12.1-arch1), with those 3 patches on top: > > "mei: vsc: Do not re-enable interrupt from vsc_tp_reset()" > "media: intel/ipu6: do not handle interrupts when device is disabled" > "spi: Fix acpi deferred irq probe" You may also want to throw these 2 into the mix. I've some hope that those will avoid the VSC chip getting stuck, requiring a power-cycle again (they do not help to "unstuck" the chip): https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/commit/?h=usb-next&id=5c5d8eb8af06df615e8b1dc88e5847196c846045 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/commit/?h=usb-next&id=2481af79671a6603fce201cbbc48f31e488e9fae >> And do you get a driver symlink under /sys/devices/platform/intel_vsc >> indicating that a driver has bound to it ? > > With the updated config: no, but I guess the dmesg output above explains it. Right, the dmesg explains that. > Sorry for the thread hijack, that's totally fine for me to continue the > discussions elsewhere if relevant. I have changed the topic to reflect the new somewhat offtopic discussions. Another place to discuss the -110 error would be: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316918 Regards, Hans