On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 08:52:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:49:58PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > I think the ACPI dependency there is as much about hiding the device on > > > > > > irrelevant platforms as anything else, might be better replaced with an > > > > > > x86 dependency though. > Oh, oh, my bad I missed acpi_dev_uid_to_integer() call. > Okay, with that in mind it's functional dependency for the ACPI-based > platforms. Do you want to keep it untouched? That's not actually what I was thinking of (please read what I wrote above, like I say I was thining about hiding things) but surely if that was a reason to keep the dependency it'd need to be an actual ACPI dependency rather than an ||?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
