Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] spi: pxa2xx: Drop ACPI_PTR() and of_match_ptr()

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:25:16PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 08:22:59PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:16:28PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 08:07:51PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> > > > Drop rather useless use of ACPI_PTR() and of_match_ptr().
> > > > It also removes the necessity to be dependent on ACPI and
> > > > of.h inclusion.
> 
> > > I think the ACPI dependency there is as much about hiding the device on
> > > irrelevant platforms as anything else, might be better replaced with an
> > > x86 dependency though.
> 
> > The whole idea behind ACPI_PTR() (which seems following the of_match_ptr()
> > implementation) looks premature. Now we have a lot of patches from DT people to
> > remove of_match_ptr(), i.o.w. make the ID visible even on non-OF platforms.
> 
> > Having the list of supported IDs is not bad thing anyway as it might help
> > to google for a device elsewhere, for example.
> 
> That's nice but I'm not sure what that has to do with the dependency on
> ACPI?

ACPI_PTR() makes ID no-op only if ACPI is defined. That also satisfies
the ugly ifdeffery that is removed by this patch as well. If there is
no dependency we will have compiler warning for defined but not used
variable.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko