On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 05:11:16PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:15:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > It's unfortunately not 100% clear, and our use of controller for the > > generic thing gets in the way a bit. There was some stuff from one of > > the open source hardware groups recently that tried to propose new names > > but I'm not immediately finding it. "host" and "target" would probably > > do the trick? > Perhaps you mean that one? > https://www.oshwa.org/a-resolution-to-redefine-spi-signal-names/ > Looks like they're replacing master with controller and > slave with peripheral. Pity, we're using controller as > an umbrella term for either one of them. > Renaming that will lead to an awful lot of churn. :( Ah, that's the one - I knew there was some reason I didn't do anything with it when I saw it. I'm not sure the churn would be worth it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
