Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] spi: introduce devm_spi_alloc_controller()

[Lukas Wunner <lukas@xxxxxxxxx>]

[+cc Geert, who originally came up with "spi_controller"]

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 10:29:32PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> Introduce devm_spi_alloc_controller() to wrap __devm_spi_alloc_controller(),
> with this wrapper, the drivers can use it to update to the modern naming.
[...]
> --- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> @@ -778,6 +778,12 @@ static inline struct spi_controller *devm_spi_alloc_slave(struct device *dev,
>  	return __devm_spi_alloc_controller(dev, size, true);
>  }
>  
> +static inline struct spi_controller *devm_spi_alloc_controller(struct device *dev,
> +							       unsigned int size)
> +{
> +	return __devm_spi_alloc_controller(dev, size, false);
> +}
> +
>  extern int spi_register_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr);
>  extern int devm_spi_register_controller(struct device *dev,
>  					struct spi_controller *ctlr);

This doesn't really make sense I'm afraid.  The umbrella term
"spi_controller" can refer to either a master or a slave.
One has to specify on allocation which of the two is desired.

An API which purports to allow allocation of the umbrella term
but defaults to a master behind the scenes seems misleading to me.

Thanks,

Lukas