On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:44 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:11 PM Jay Fang <f.fangjian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2021/5/6 16:14, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Thursday, May 6, 2021, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > On Thursday, May 6, 2021, Jay Fang <f.fangjian@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:f.fangjian@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > > > This series introduces a generic implementation to solve the conflict > > > between the 'cs-gpios' flags and the optional SPI slaves flags. So we > > > don't need to add two similar quirks separately for DT and ACPI. > > > > NAK. There is a patch against documentation that clarifies polarity of GPIO for ACPI. I have a fix for that to use generic implementation of CS GPIOs . > > > > Thanks. Has the Fix patch been merged ? Commit Id ? It's here https://gitlab.com/andy-shev/next/-/commit/5ccbdbb4787d871722f361d77c5f3cb806811c48 and now I remember that I didn't dare to make it as a fix due to: - recent (non-fix) dependencies - no existing driver uses it for ACPI (at least nothing has been reported) > Not yet. I'm planning to send it next week (after v5.13-rc1 is out) as a fix. > For your convenience the whole story is available in my publick branch: > > https://gitlab.com/andy-shev/next/-/tree/topic/spi/reload > > and yes, I have tested it on real hardware. > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=bleeding-edge&id=ec3576eac11d66a388b6cba6a7cfb3b45039a712 <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=bleeding-edge&id=ec3576eac11d66a388b6cba6a7cfb3b45039a712> > > > > > > > > > If your ACPI table uses GPIO CS with polarity low (assumes _DSD() is involved), this is a bug. Fix firmware or do a quirk specific for your platform. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko