Re: [PATCH 0/2] spi: Correct CS GPIOs polarity when using GPIO descriptors

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:11 PM Jay Fang <f.fangjian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2021/5/6 16:14, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 6, 2021, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >     On Thursday, May 6, 2021, Jay Fang <f.fangjian@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:f.fangjian@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> >         This series introduces a generic implementation to solve the conflict
> >         between the 'cs-gpios' flags and the optional SPI slaves flags. So we
> >         don't need to add two similar quirks separately for DT and ACPI.

> >     NAK. There is a patch against documentation that clarifies polarity of GPIO for ACPI. I have a fix for that to use generic implementation of  CS GPIOs .
>
> Thanks. Has the Fix patch been merged ? Commit Id ?

Not yet. I'm planning to send it next week (after v5.13-rc1 is out) as a fix.
For your convenience the whole story is available in my publick branch:

https://gitlab.com/andy-shev/next/-/tree/topic/spi/reload

and yes, I have tested it on real hardware.

> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=bleeding-edge&id=ec3576eac11d66a388b6cba6a7cfb3b45039a712 <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=bleeding-edge&id=ec3576eac11d66a388b6cba6a7cfb3b45039a712>
> >
> >
> > If your ACPI table uses GPIO CS with polarity low (assumes _DSD() is involved), this is a bug. Fix firmware or do a quirk specific for your platform.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko