On 20/08/20 9:08 am, Chris Packham wrote: > > On 19/08/20 6:15 pm, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> On 19.08.2020 00:44, Chris Packham wrote: >>> Hi Again, >>> >>> On 17/08/20 9:09 am, Chris Packham wrote: >>> >>>> On 14/08/20 6:19 pm, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >>>>> On 14.08.2020 04:48, Chris Packham wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm seeing a problem with accessing spi-nor after upgrading a T2081 >>>>>> based system to linux v5.7.15 >>>>>> >>>>>> For this board u-boot and the u-boot environment live on spi-nor. >>>>>> >>>>>> When I use fw_setenv from userspace I get the following kernel logs >>>>>> >>>>>> # fw_setenv foo=1 >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but rx/tx fifo's aren't empty! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: SPIE_RXCNT = 1, SPIE_TXCNT = 32 >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but rx/tx fifo's aren't empty! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: SPIE_RXCNT = 1, SPIE_TXCNT = 32 >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but rx/tx fifo's aren't empty! >>>>>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: SPIE_RXCNT = 1, SPIE_TXCNT = 32 >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>> This error reporting doesn't exist yet in 4.4. So you may have an >>>>> issue >>>>> under 4.4 too, it's just not reported. >>>>> Did you verify that under 4.4 fw_setenv actually has an effect? >>>> Just double checked and yes under 4.4 the setting does get saved. >>>>>> If I run fw_printenv (before getting it into a bad state) it is >>>>>> able to >>>>>> display the content of the boards u-boot environment. >>>>>> >>>>> This might indicate an issue with spi being locked. I've seen related >>>>> questions, just use the search engine of your choice and check for >>>>> fw_setenv and locked. >>>> I'm running a version of fw_setenv which includes >>>> https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/commit/db820159 so it shouldn't >>>> be locking things unnecessarily. >>>>>> If been unsuccessful in producing a setup for bisecting the >>>>>> issue. I do >>>>>> know the issue doesn't occur on the old 4.4.x based kernel but >>>>>> that's >>>>>> probably not much help. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any pointers on what the issue (and/or solution) might be. >>> I finally managed to get our board running with a vanilla kernel. With >>> corenet64_smp_defconfig I occasionally see >>> >>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>> >>> other than the message things seem to be working. >>> >>> With a custom defconfig I see >>> >>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! >>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but rx/tx fifo's aren't >>> empty! >>> fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: SPIE_RXCNT = 1, SPIE_TXCNT = 32 >>> ... >>> >>> and access to the spi-nor does not work until the board is reset. >>> >>> I'll try and pick apart the differences between the two defconfigs. > > I now think my earlier testing is invalid. I have seen the problem > with either defconfig if I try hard enough. I had convinced myself > that the problem was CONFIG_PREEMPT but that was before I found > boot-to-boot differences with the same kernel. > > It's possible that I'm chasing multiple issues with the same symptom. > > The error I'm most concerned with is in the sequence > 1. boot with old image > 2. write environment > 3. boot with new image > 4. write environment > 5. write fails and environment is corrupted > > After I recover the system things sometimes seem fine. Until I repeat > the sequence above. > >> Also relevant may be: >> - Which dts are you using? > Custom but based heavily on the t2080rdb. >> - What's the spi-nor type, and at which frequency are you operating it? > The board has several alternate parts for the spi-nor so the dts just > specifies compatible = "jedec,spi-nor" the actual chip detected on the > board I have is "n25q032a (4096 Kbytes)". The dts sets > spi-max-frequency = <10000000> I haven't measured the actual frequency > on the bus. >> - Does the issue still happen if you lower the frequency? > I did play around with the frequency initially but I should probably > give that another go now that I have a better reproduction method. Playing around with the frequency didn't help. One thing that I've found is that the problem appears to be that I end up with extra bytes in the RX FIFO. If I add code to drain the RX FIFO then the system is able to keep accessing the spi-nor (albeit with some noisy logs).