On 14.08.2020 04:48, Chris Packham wrote: > Hi, > > I'm seeing a problem with accessing spi-nor after upgrading a T2081 > based system to linux v5.7.15 > > For this board u-boot and the u-boot environment live on spi-nor. > > When I use fw_setenv from userspace I get the following kernel logs > > # fw_setenv foo=1 > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but SPIE_DON isn't set! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but rx/tx fifo's aren't empty! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: SPIE_RXCNT = 1, SPIE_TXCNT = 32 > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but rx/tx fifo's aren't empty! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: SPIE_RXCNT = 1, SPIE_TXCNT = 32 > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: Transfer done but rx/tx fifo's aren't empty! > fsl_espi ffe110000.spi: SPIE_RXCNT = 1, SPIE_TXCNT = 32 > ... > This error reporting doesn't exist yet in 4.4. So you may have an issue under 4.4 too, it's just not reported. Did you verify that under 4.4 fw_setenv actually has an effect? > If I run fw_printenv (before getting it into a bad state) it is able to > display the content of the boards u-boot environment. > This might indicate an issue with spi being locked. I've seen related questions, just use the search engine of your choice and check for fw_setenv and locked. > If been unsuccessful in producing a setup for bisecting the issue. I do > know the issue doesn't occur on the old 4.4.x based kernel but that's > probably not much help. > > Any pointers on what the issue (and/or solution) might be. > > Thanks, > Chris > Heiner