On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 06:21:18PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 07:37:25PM +0530, Kuldip Dwivedi wrote: > > > The whole point with the device property API is that it works with > > > both DT and ACPI without needing separate parsing, though in this > > > case I'm wondering why we'd need to specify this in an ACPI system > > > at all? > > Understood. Will take care in v2 PATCH > IMO there is zero reason for the existence of the "spi-num-chipselects" > property even for DT. We should deprecate it (start ignoring it in > existing device tree deployments) and populate struct > fsl_dspi_devtype_data with that info based on SoC compatible string. Yes, it's a legacy from bad board file conversions and shouldn't be used at all.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
