On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:56:01AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > That was the unanswered question. > FTR: your reference to an "unanswered question" wasn't optimal either. I > had to search my inbox for a while to determine what you could have > meant :-) At the time I wrote that I didn't actually know, I just knew that I'd remembered the subthread ended with a question to Marek about if this was needed. > > Please include human readable descriptions of things like commits and > > issues being discussed in e-mail in your mails, this makes them much > > easier for humans to read especially when they have no internet access. > I'm always willing to learn how to make my mails more cooperative. > I'd hope that even when offline you have a linux.git at hand to resolve > what I meant with "6fd8b8503a0dcf66510314dc054745087ae89f94". Apart from > this unannotated commit hash it's not clear to me what else could have > been improved here. Including the title of the commit. It's not just about offline usage, it's also about making the mail easier to read - having to stop and use another tool to understand what's being talked about is a blocker to the flow of reading the message.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
