On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 08:13:00AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 01:14:28AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > It looked like there was an unanswered question about if patch 2 was > > needed or not? Marek? > I cannot find an unanswered question. There is a workaround that Marek > introduced in 6fd8b8503a0dcf66510314dc054745087ae89f94 that might not be > needed any more with my patch 2. So it's the other way round: If Marek's > problem is fixed by patch 2, my patch is the better one. I have problems > with SCK changing polarity when CS is already asserted in the presence > of Marek's change. After my change they are gone. Even if this > workaround is superflous now, it doesn't hurt and IMHO the question if > it is needed or not should not delay my fix. That was the unanswered question. Please include human readable descriptions of things like commits and issues being discussed in e-mail in your mails, this makes them much easier for humans to read especially when they have no internet access. I do frequently catch up on my mail on flights or while otherwise travelling so this is even more pressing for me than just being about making things a bit easier to read.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
