On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 09:43:11AM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote: > > > The spi_sync_single_transfer function calls spi_sync_transfer > > > with a single spi_transfer element, instead of an array. > > So, what's the advantage of using this as opposed to calling > > spi_sync_transfer with a 1 for the number of transfers? > Not much, but it keeps the code a bit nicer to read for those > using spi_sync_transfer with only one spi_transfer. Besides it's > also more understandable what the function itself does and there > would not be any need to jump into the spi_sync_transfer to check > what the number '1' is needed for (for example it's not a boolean > 'true' value). I really don't think this has been a big source of confusion for people.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
