On 06/16/2016 01:40 AM, Andi Shyti wrote: > The spi_sync_single_transfer function calls spi_sync_transfer > with a single spi_transfer element, instead of an array. So, what's the advantage of using this as opposed to calling spi_sync_transfer with a 1 for the number of transfers? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single spi_transfer
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single spi_transfer
- From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:10:48 +0200
- Cc: linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andi Shyti <andi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <1466034046-718-1-git-send-email-andi.shyti@samsung.com>
- References: <1466034046-718-1-git-send-email-andi.shyti@samsung.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.8.0
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] regmap: Add regmap_pipe_read API
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single spi_transfer
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single spi_transfer
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single spi_transfer
- Index(es):
 |