Hi Lars, > > The spi_sync_single_transfer function calls spi_sync_transfer > > with a single spi_transfer element, instead of an array. > > So, what's the advantage of using this as opposed to calling > spi_sync_transfer with a 1 for the number of transfers? Not much, but it keeps the code a bit nicer to read for those using spi_sync_transfer with only one spi_transfer. Besides it's also more understandable what the function itself does and there would not be any need to jump into the spi_sync_transfer to check what the number '1' is needed for (for example it's not a boolean 'true' value). I checked and there are quite many uses of spi_sync_transfer with only 1 transfer. Thanks, Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html