On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 02:10:57PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > On 23.03.2016 13:54, Mark Brown wrote: > > I haven't looked at your new code at all. What I'm saying is that > > specifying a per-device MBus window seems like pointless complexity. > I don't necessarily share this opinions. Code-wise, its less complex > that re-configuring (removing the old and creating the new) the MBus > window. But I have no strong feeling here. Whatever is decided that > should be used, I can go with. No, really - it's just unhelpful. Putting this in the ABI means that every single system integrator who cares about performance is going to need to go and manually figure out how to configure this in DT and manually select values. That's not doing a good job for users, it's making their lives harder for no gain. If there are no physical constraints then how we allocate space in the MBus should be a runtime thing, it shouldn't be part of the ABI.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature