Hi Mark, On 23.03.2016 13:54, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:59:40PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: >> On 23.03.2016 12:33, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> No, there's two separate things here. The big problem with what you >>> originally sent was that you were defining a window per SPI device but >>> this is a part of the SPI controller so having to change windows per >>> device is just going to make the code more complex. > >> I'm sorry, but this sentence is not totally clear to me: Do you mean >> that the "more complex" code in v2 with the MBus window reconfiguration >> is not good? Or do you mean that in the RFC version, the switching >> between the SPI devices was too complex? > > I haven't looked at your new code at all. What I'm saying is that > specifying a per-device MBus window seems like pointless complexity. I don't necessarily share this opinions. Code-wise, its less complex that re-configuring (removing the old and creating the new) the MBus window. But I have no strong feeling here. Whatever is decided that should be used, I can go with. Thomas, Arnd (or anyone else?), do you have any comments or preferences which way to go here? Thanks, Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html