On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:59:40PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > On 23.03.2016 12:33, Mark Brown wrote: > > No, there's two separate things here. The big problem with what you > > originally sent was that you were defining a window per SPI device but > > this is a part of the SPI controller so having to change windows per > > device is just going to make the code more complex. > I'm sorry, but this sentence is not totally clear to me: Do you mean > that the "more complex" code in v2 with the MBus window reconfiguration > is not good? Or do you mean that in the RFC version, the switching > between the SPI devices was too complex? I haven't looked at your new code at all. What I'm saying is that specifying a per-device MBus window seems like pointless complexity. > > There's also the > > separate issue of where any MBus windows we get come up with. > Could you also please explain this in more detail? What do you mean > with that? Do you mean the physical address, that is defined in the > DT for this MBus window? I had thought that this was what this subthread was about but you appeared to be confused.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
