On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:40:52PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > I would need some naming suggestions (we call our protokol SSI). It > looks like the protocol used by us has some differences with Davinci. > The Dav. using SPI_READY line only > to allow or pause transmission (fix me if i'm wrong) > We call it Request line and use it to: Ready to Receive; Receive > Finished; and Request data shift by slave. Oh, so this isn't SPI_READY? > In this case probably spi framework need to be extended with kind of > request call back. If data is currently not transmitted and Req line is > not used for flow control, then call driver specific function to > initiate data shift. This is sounding awfully like SPI slave support?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
