On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:04:24PM +0100, Martin Sperl wrote: > The bigger question (based on your comments to Patch 2/3) is: I haven't even looked at your reply ot that yet. > Do you want to follow the devres approach (i.e: hiding > "struct spi_res" after allocation and returning "void *" > to the data-payload only in spi_res_alloc)? > Or do you prefer to have "struct spi_res" as an explicit member of > a structure (i.e. in Patch 2/3 "struct spi_res_replaced_transfers")? I wasn't aware that was an issue?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
