> On 03.09.2015, at 14:12, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:56:04AM +0530, Ranjit Waghmode wrote: > >> To support dual parallel mode operation of ZynqMP GQSPI controller >> following API's are added inside the core: > > As covered in SubmittingPatches please try to make each patch a single > change rather than having multiple separate changes in one commit. > >> + /* Controller may support more than one chip. >> + * This flag will enable that feature. >> + */ >> +#define SPI_MASTER_BOTH_CS BIT(8) /* enable both chips */ > > This isn't saying that the controller supports more than one chip, it's > saying that the controller supports asserting more than one chip select > at once which isn't the same thing. I'm also not entirely sure that > this makes sense as a separate feature to the data striping one - I'm > struggling to think of a way to use this sensibly separately to that. Well - there is one use-case that I can think of: fbtft has the requirement for some devices to control a GPIO to differentiate between command and data getting transferred - sort of 9 bit. Right now it is done outside of spi in the fbtft driver itself wrapping spi_sync(). Similarly a “hold” line on an eeprom or similar could get (de)asserted without requiring holding a spi-bus-lock. But then the current patch would not allow this kind of “generic” use-case. Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html