On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:02:22PM +0200, Martin Sperl wrote: > >> I got a patch in the meantime exposing the following files in >> /sys/devices/platform/soc/20204000.spi/spi_master/spi32766/statistics/: >> bytes >> bytes_rx >> bytes_tx >> bytes_transfer_histo_0-1 >> bytes_transfer_histo_1024-2047 > >> If so then I would post a “basic” patch for the other statistics >> and have debugfs for the histogram as a separate patch. > > Either approach works for me, though I suppose we might want to bikeshed > the naming of the histogram files above (but I can't think of better > ideas immediately) and I guess from a user point of view getting the Zero-prefixing the numbers in the filenames would make it a bit less ugly and auto-sorted... > histogram as a histogram might be more helpful so people might be > happier with debugfs. ... but indeed, quoting Documentation/filesystems/debugfs.txt: "Unlike sysfs, which has strict one-value-per-file rules, debugfs has no rules at all." So storing the whole histogram in a single file sounds like the logical thing to me. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in