On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:07:28PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:16:01AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > lkml.org is being terrible as usual so I can't see half the thread (or > > > at least got fed up trying to get it to load) > > > A part of it is also here: > > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1405.0/00484.html > > OK, thanks. > > > > but I think the discussion there petered out more than anything > > > else. > > > Maybe it did :) > > I think so looking at the archives. > > > > Or was it the suggestion to make this something that the driver core > > > supported so that we didn't have to open code it for every bus? > > > Probably. That's something I really haven't took the time to look at, > > and don't really plan on doing so. > > > I guess a good way forward would be to revive this patch, and wait for > > that generic way to happen. > > > What do you think of this? > > Probably best, the Pi bootloader does make it a bit more important. > Might also be worth speaking to Greg though. So, do you want me to resend that patch and discuss this directly there (with Greg in Cc) ? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
