On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:16:01AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 02:51:13PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 02:38:18PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > > > >> I don't know if it's been suggested before, certainly nobody did the > > > >> work to make it happen. I don't think I have a massive objection in > > > >> principal. > > > Actually, I did it a year ago, and it looked at the time that it > > wasn't what should be done either. > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/28/612 > > lkml.org is being terrible as usual so I can't see half the thread (or > at least got fed up trying to get it to load) A part of it is also here: http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1405.0/00484.html > but I think the discussion there petered out more than anything > else. Maybe it did :) > Or was it the suggestion to make this something that the driver core > supported so that we didn't have to open code it for every bus? Probably. That's something I really haven't took the time to look at, and don't really plan on doing so. I guess a good way forward would be to revive this patch, and wait for that generic way to happen. What do you think of this? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature