On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > >> +A spidev example for devicetree binding in a board dts file >> +&spi2 { > > No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The > fact that we have a binding document at all is a bug. And how do you get spidev if nothing binds to it? When you boot without the binding no device is created. Thanks Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html