On 29 April 2015 at 20:06, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 07:44:59PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> On 29 April 2015 at 19:40, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Please stop this, it is not helpful. > >> Then please make one of the useful ways of instantiating spidev nodes >> approved or suggest another that when implemented can be mainlined. > > I think the rest of the thread had that covered - there's both adding > the device IDs and Maxime's patch. And adding device IDs is unacceptable for users of devboards while Maxime's patch is not accepted into the kernel. I am using a version of Maxime's patch myself right now. It does not seem it's going to be include in the kernel any time soon, however. FWIW I added the ability to open any CS, even those claimed by kernel drivers. This addresses any potential race of spidev binding before the actual driver but has the potential to introduce some subtle bugs when you open and reconfigure a CS used by a kernel driver or send some commands that upset the device. Thanks Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html