On 28 April 2015 at 19:17, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:22:24PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> On 28 April 2015 at 16:16, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > That is not the case as you well know. As has been said several times >> > the compatible for the device should be added to the match table in >> > spidev.c. > >> That's a way unusable for people who actually want to use spidev so it >> might be TheApprovedWay(tm) but not RightWay(tm). > > I'm pretty sure that someone who's able to edit one file can edit two. > I know you have a viewpoint on this but engaging in this way is not > helping anyone. The point is that patching the kernel to use spidev is totally useless complication which is brought on spidev users by obtuse kernel maintainers. This patch applied to a kernel which is distributed with the board solves the problem for all spidev users of the board which TheApprovedWay(tm) does not. Thanks Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html