> On 25.03.2015, at 19:50, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This sounds like you're trying to work aroud the core rather than work > with the core - enhance the core so that it can express what you need. > Working in a single driver makes things more local without having a "moving" target with lots of other patches. If done right most of it then can get moved to the core - if needed... >> From my perspective I want to minimize the dependencies while I create >> this proof of concept. >> And for my testing this with several different devices I need support >> for multiple devices and for that I need this patch go in first. >> Taking baby steps here. > > I had been under the impression that you had already done a lot of proof > of concept work with this stuff? I had an Idea - that specific one has not been tested yet, but from the measurements on interrupt and scheduling latencies these seem low hanging fruit. > >> Also there is another point here, that Stephen pointed out: >> Would not a switch from the use of the "native-cs" to "gpio-only" mean >> a required change in Device-tree? And isn't DT assumed to be a stabe API? > > Can you be more specific about what change you think might be required? > Currently the driver doesn't support GPIOs as chip selects at all so > anything enabling them is going to be new. Well, if we say we "need" gpio_cs to be set in DT of the master, then that might be assumed an API change that might break some custom device-trees - I was mostly referring to that. So how would that situation be with the requirement to use the GPIO_CS explicitly? >> So to summarize: do you want me to move to transfer_one instead and >> then revert back for the optimizations? > > Drivers should in general be moving to use modern APIs. If current APIs > need enhancing then look into doing that. OK, so I will try to take the "modernization" approach, but a quick look shows some headaches, that the current driver is hiding behind scheduling latencies... Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html