Re: [RFC/PATCHv2 3/3] spi: dw-spi: Pointers select 16b vs. 32b DesignWare access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:46 AM,  <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Altera's Arria10 SoC interconnect requires a 32 bit write for APB
> peripherals. The current spi-dw driver uses 16bit accesses in
> some locations. Use function pointers to support 32 bit accesses
> but retain legacy 16 bit access.
>

Thanks for this version. My comments below.

> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c |    7 ++++++-
>  drivers/spi/spi-dw.c      |   29 +++++++++++++++++------------
>  drivers/spi/spi-dw.h      |   12 ++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c
> index eb03e12..c4fe9e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c
> @@ -76,8 +76,13 @@ static int dw_spi_mmio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>         num_cs = 4;
>
> -       if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> +       if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
>                 of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "num-cs", &num_cs);
> +               if (of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "32bit_access")) {
> +                       dws->read_w = dw_readw32;
> +                       dws->write_w = dw_writew32;

Can we use just  readw/writew (w/o underscores) as names for the accessors?

> +               }
> +       }
>
>         dws->num_cs = num_cs;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.c
> index c5fa2be..d008791 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static inline u32 tx_max(struct dw_spi *dws)
>         u32 tx_left, tx_room, rxtx_gap;
>
>         tx_left = (dws->tx_end - dws->tx) / dws->n_bytes;
> -       tx_room = dws->fifo_len - dw_readw(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLR);
> +       tx_room = dws->fifo_len - dws->read_w(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLR);
>
>         /*
>          * Another concern is about the tx/rx mismatch, we
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static inline u32 rx_max(struct dw_spi *dws)
>  {
>         u32 rx_left = (dws->rx_end - dws->rx) / dws->n_bytes;
>
> -       return min_t(u32, rx_left, dw_readw(dws, DW_SPI_RXFLR));
> +       return min_t(u32, rx_left, dws->read_w(dws, DW_SPI_RXFLR));
>  }
>
>  static void dw_writer(struct dw_spi *dws)
> @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static void dw_writer(struct dw_spi *dws)
>                         else
>                                 txw = *(u16 *)(dws->tx);
>                 }
> -               dw_writew(dws, DW_SPI_DR, txw);
> +               dws->write_w(dws, DW_SPI_DR, txw);
>                 dws->tx += dws->n_bytes;
>         }
>  }
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static void dw_reader(struct dw_spi *dws)
>         u16 rxw;
>
>         while (max--) {
> -               rxw = dw_readw(dws, DW_SPI_DR);
> +               rxw = dws->read_w(dws, DW_SPI_DR);
>                 /* Care rx only if the transfer's original "rx" is not null */
>                 if (dws->rx_end - dws->len) {
>                         if (dws->n_bytes == 1)
> @@ -254,11 +254,11 @@ static void int_error_stop(struct dw_spi *dws, const char *msg)
>
>  static irqreturn_t interrupt_transfer(struct dw_spi *dws)
>  {
> -       u16 irq_status = dw_readw(dws, DW_SPI_ISR);
> +       u16 irq_status = dws->read_w(dws, DW_SPI_ISR);
>
>         /* Error handling */
>         if (irq_status & (SPI_INT_TXOI | SPI_INT_RXOI | SPI_INT_RXUI)) {
> -               dw_readw(dws, DW_SPI_ICR);
> +               dws->read_w(dws, DW_SPI_ICR);
>                 int_error_stop(dws, "interrupt_transfer: fifo overrun/underrun");
>                 return IRQ_HANDLED;
>         }
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dw_spi_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  {
>         struct spi_master *master = dev_id;
>         struct dw_spi *dws = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> -       u16 irq_status = dw_readw(dws, DW_SPI_ISR) & 0x3f;
> +       u16 irq_status = dws->read_w(dws, DW_SPI_ISR) & 0x3f;
>
>         if (!irq_status)
>                 return IRQ_NONE;
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int dw_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master,
>                 cr0 |= (chip->tmode << SPI_TMOD_OFFSET);
>         }
>
> -       dw_writew(dws, DW_SPI_CTRL0, cr0);
> +       dws->write_w(dws, DW_SPI_CTRL0, cr0);
>
>         /* Check if current transfer is a DMA transaction */
>         dws->dma_mapped = map_dma_buffers(master, spi, transfer);
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int dw_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master,
>          */
>         if (!dws->dma_mapped && !chip->poll_mode) {
>                 txlevel = min_t(u16, dws->fifo_len / 2, dws->len / dws->n_bytes);
> -               dw_writew(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLTR, txlevel);
> +               dws->write_w(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLTR, txlevel);
>
>                 /* Set the interrupt mask */
>                 imask |= SPI_INT_TXEI | SPI_INT_TXOI |
> @@ -516,11 +516,11 @@ static void spi_hw_init(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws)
>                 u32 fifo;
>
>                 for (fifo = 1; fifo < 256; fifo++) {
> -                       dw_writew(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLTR, fifo);
> -                       if (fifo != dw_readw(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLTR))
> +                       dws->write_w(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLTR, fifo);
> +                       if (fifo != dws->read_w(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLTR))
>                                 break;
>                 }
> -               dw_writew(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLTR, 0);
> +               dws->write_w(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLTR, 0);
>
>                 dws->fifo_len = (fifo == 1) ? 0 : fifo;
>                 dev_dbg(dev, "Detected FIFO size: %u bytes\n", dws->fifo_len);
> @@ -545,6 +545,11 @@ int dw_spi_add_host(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws)
>         dws->dma_addr = (dma_addr_t)(dws->paddr + 0x60);
>         snprintf(dws->name, sizeof(dws->name), "dw_spi%d", dws->bus_num);
>
> +       if (!dws->read_w)
> +               dws->read_w = dw_readw;
> +       if (!dws->write_w)
> +               dws->write_w = dw_writew;
> +
>         ret = devm_request_irq(dev, dws->irq, dw_spi_irq, IRQF_SHARED,
>                         dws->name, master);
>         if (ret < 0) {
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h
> index 855bfdd..1df09e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h
> @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ struct dw_spi {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>         struct dentry *debugfs;
>  #endif
> +       u16 (*read_w)(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 offset);
> +       void (*write_w)(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 offset, u16 val);
>  };
>
>  static inline u32 dw_readl(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 offset)
> @@ -163,6 +165,16 @@ static inline void dw_writew(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 offset, u16 val)
>         __raw_writew(val, dws->regs + offset);
>  }
>
> +static inline u16 dw_readw32(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 offset)
> +{
> +       return (u16)__raw_readl(dws->regs + offset);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void dw_writew32(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 offset, u16 val)
> +{
> +       __raw_writel((u32)val, dws->regs + offset);
> +}
> +

So, does simple
dws->readw = dw_readl;
dws->writew = dw_writel;

work for you?

>  static inline void spi_enable_chip(struct dw_spi *dws, int enable)
>  {
>         dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_SSIENR, (enable ? 1 : 0));
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux