Voxin was: Re: Switching to Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ah well, figured it was worth asking about.
Just some thoughts:
A lot of these voices, e.g. pico and flite, sound quite good, aside from their pitch shifting.
IBM's synth has a much "rougher" sound to me, but the roughness is tempered with the constant but small pitch shifts.
I would find it educational to get a list of attributes that make IBMTTS better than some of the alternatives.
Maybe see if we could change one of the alternatives to have these attributes.
Just my 2C after a sleepless night; take it with a grain of salt.

Brandon McGinty-Carroll


On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 01:19:53AM -0700, Tony Baechler wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> Thank you for mentioning this!  That was the point I was trying to make,
> but I wasn't sure how to put it.  No, I don't see it becoming open source
> any time soon.  It would be better to either rewrite something already out
> there or write something from scratch, such as what was done with ESpeak.
>  Say what you want about the quality of the voice, but ESpeak still
> remains the only truly open source solution in active development which
> doesn't crash and is very responsive.  The Festival voices seem to be
> abandoned if I understand correctly.  Mbrola isn't bad, but it is non-free
> and is also not further developed.
> 
> With that said, I know very little about Voxin or whatever you want to
> call it except that Oralux probably shouldn't legally be packaging it,
> which is another reason why I wouldn't buy it.  I do know that there is
> such a thing as Eloquence for Linux which sounds the same as ViaVoice but
> it isn't.  I have used it and the old APH Braille+ ships it.  When this
> was pointed out to me, I didn't believe it, but I tracked down the library
> on the system.  I'm pretty sure it uses an ARM processor, so that won't
> help much.  Also, as I mentioned in a previous post, GW Micro ships a
> "new" version with Window-Eyes now.  I don't know what version it is or
> what the differences are, but it's supposed to not crash as often and
> maybe (I don't know) it supports 64-bit Windows since there is a 64-bit
> Window-Eyes.  Therefore, just from my own evidence, I would agree that
> it's still making money under whatever name you want to call it.  By all
> means I hope they're willing to release the source, but don't hold your
> breath.
> 
> On 5/11/2013 11:36 AM, Janina Sajka wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> 
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRj1CoAAoJEPrAuJWnLe0yz8YP/i/T3C202GOJBkuh+kOoHXEn
> p4h1eca6F/H5Z9R4LJeRMwTZ5/Jsf7YKlmuX6tohlKqv8n4ZpWDauZmzOyRqmijF
> vhN/Xxdbg/BfOnWXUxdNVLBSREcwQItj8Id/EBztxMvHMZ+drjberrFPzI674sge
> m6Hftv/UGzbi7SssyyZMVO27ZqQkX7qh29Et+r4E8AdKWYQeOkKdo4xYRLJGsw7L
> ZPqc5kuuXidDC/uZMnw4nwXpC7Qhn6ZzAvJzqJUiE65mrYBJlq4sFazXQ92n0j6J
> 81Ws9Zkup4VmfB4FnjefSAU8bWXi4EilKKg2BTwiJjNAKTdXBnh9kTInPC02Ls/W
> gL7/j6rMe7PpCeGzwpyU2rNhZ88Oym379u4vXSJKrbHXfpqS+v/x4pxF3kzixEzE
> gzIJ1fwhXc00mCT98Q1EZVwLm3JptnzpcFpr+ntuNXq9mwk4Fuv1GZs8L6m6dW6E
> 45xCG/VFZciZiKlfaxtvI0SL+ORRxM9c7faWjPSmpt8USr2aI4d9kkWxlEXWpx4Y
> oPYSEm6hOjmymcSS319eGTvbVSXRoDr860BSjZtH/1bF9JYbSGege5akDkorvmYb
> TMqZju0p2mr9Q0XnwzZw0Q54z3dZedWuK5wWTB1IQPkR5uyuI83HZ4Acnr2JQ4vp
> nPkrwHqgg1si8X6PIcDb
> =jfCk
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at linux-speakup.org
> http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup


[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux