-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael, Before moving to emacs, give "ne" a spin. I have abandoned nano in favor of ne and like it a lot. "ne" stands for "nice editor". Chuck On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:59:52PM +0000, Michael Whapples wrote: > Hello, > I am currently looking for a better editor than my current favourite > (nano). I have just been doing some bash scripting training, and in that > they were teaching using vi (the training was for people who may never > have used unix before), but I have to say I just wasn't getting on with > vi. How does speakup work with vi best? I found it not very good. People > were saying to me that nano isn't so powerful (and I know what they are > getting at), so I am thinking about emacs (or emacspeak). It seems more > to my liking than vi, but I have a few questions about it. If I were to > use emacspeak, how is it best to stop conflicts of speakup and emacspeak > wanting to use the same synth (an apollo in my case)? Or is it good to > use emacs with speakup (so doing away with emacspeak? Or alternatively, > is there any other editors people might suggest. > > From > Michael Whapples > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup - -- The Moon is Waning Gibbous (54% of Full) My web site is located at: http://hallenbeck.ftml.net We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done. A.N. Turing, 1950 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHKdKK0maTgpPXM9cRAiClAJ9rUk6i5f8ms/u222Rkvi+2i08FsgCaAvV5 GEhIpX39MFXGabxucPy8rRk= =16TK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
