Linux and data storage?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



*we* agreed on no such thing.
I have no intention of risking a zip of any of these files, nor do i want 
to have to create alist.
I want a direct uninterrupted transfer of the entire contents of  my home 
directory here minus the shellworld programs themselves to a directory so 
created on the ftp area of my site to so store them as a backup.
no one said anything about ziping anything.
Tar was s mentioned before you came in this morning yes.


On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Janina Sajka wrote:

> I don't know how sftp would be better?
>
> 1.)	You can specify a file mask to transfer multiple files with scp.
>
> 2.)	You can specify multiple source files with scp, and do so in one
> command where sftp would require you to do one at a time if you didn't
> use a file mask.
>
> And, didn't we agree that the better strategy would be to tar and either
> bun or gun zip the archive first?
>
> Luke Davis writes:
>> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Luke Yelavich wrote:
>>
>>> The tools I am thinking of, are the SSH suite of tools, particularly one
>>> command being scp. This command allows you to copy data securely over a
>>> network connection, by means of encryption.
>>
>> sftp, might be a better option, for several files.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Speakup mailing list
>> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
>> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
> -- 
>
> 				Janina Sajka, Chair
> 				Accessibility Workgroup
> 				Free Standards Group (FSG)
>
> janina at freestandards.org	Phone: +1 202.494.7040
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux